transparency to life

Bring Your Body to Life

on Jan 21, 2010

What is the essence of yourself? Certainly your mind. Definitely your personality. And especially your body. So treat it well. Of course you should fuel it properly. And bring it to life!

Our bodies are incredible masterpieces with amazing capabilities. So why not let them shine? So get moving. Do fun things. Enjoy the soreness because it’s a sign of progress. Bask in the mighty health benefits that physical activity brings.

Run/bike/skate through the neighborhood. Take up a sport. Practice a martial art. Walk around with energy. Run up the stairs. Throw yourself upside down. And turn that boring life upside down!

How do you bring your body to life?

The Meaning of Life and Death

on Jan 21, 2010

Science, from the perspective of evolution, can give us a remarkably simple explanation of  the notion of ‘death’. Simply put: it’s beneficial. Not to the individual organism, but rather to its genetic information. Death allows for adaptability as each new organism that comes to life has varied genetic information from the previous generation (in most species) and this in turn could provide better traits for surivival in the continuously changing environment. So in a way, genetic information is potentially immortal, though in return it gives up a piece of its “essence” every generation. That leaves us individuals in the crossfire of evolution: we have life and death at the benefit of genetic information but at the expense of each of us individually.

Absurdity in a Soda Tax

on Jan 21, 2010

There’s talk in NY to instate a tax on soda in order to combat obesity. I believe these efforts are commendable because they could realistically reduce soda consumption. But I think the idea is absolutely absurd. We already pay a tax on soda: one that lowers its cost in the first place. Our tax dollars subsidize the production of corn and this greatly deflates the cost of producing soda. The cost of soda is artificially low because of this.

Applying a tax ignores this root of the problem and is instead a superficial fix. We would be much better off if the true price of soda was realistically reflected on the market. This would likely produce a stronger impact than a soda tax. Approaching the root of the problem would be extremely difficult though primarily because industries have a stranglehold on our government and the industries would fight hard to protect their interests. Still, if one part of government has the guts to consider a soda tax, there is hope that it can stand up for its people and not for the industries.

What do you think of the idea of a soda tax?

True Danger Lies in the Unexpected

on Jan 21, 2010

If you know something to be dangerous, then you can prepare for it. You can take steps to account for the danger. You can be ready to take it on or brace for it. In a way, the danger is no longer so dangerous.

But if the danger is neither seen nor expected, it can blindside you. Even something minor, if not accounted for can trip you up or even set off a chain reaction. We should take care to be as aware of all dangers, however minor, and intelligently prepare.

Science, the Critical Process for Ideas

on Jan 21, 2010

Under the definition that technology is a tool that helps us advance our lives, science represents a very ancient yet still essential technology. Science is the tool of analyzing and making sense of the world. Its primary weapon is doubt. By constantly subjecting any concept [explaining some part of the world] to skepticism, we test its plausibility. What is left (but still subject to doubt) is an understanding that we can rely on more so.

The creative process is also this scientific process. The way we form ideas follows this. Every idea is subject to critique and it is the good ones that stand this test. It is imperative to have lots of ideas, including seemingly bad ones, because you never know which ones will actually be good ones. It likely takes ninety-nine bad ideas to make a good idea, but the creative (scientific) process will allow good ones to prevail.

Another place that the critical scientific process is present is in our genes. The process of natural selection (evolution) uses the ability to replicate genetic information as the critical yardstick. And while the changes that appear in genetic information are at first random, the critical process determines which changes are better. Consistent with the creative process, there are a large number of bad changes for every positive one. But it is those few positive changes that matter so dearly, as with those few good ideas, and these positive changes or ideas can only exist through having all the bad ones.

So don’t be afraid to explore thoughts that are outrageous. You never know which crazy ideas will turn out to be fantastic ones. And don’t be afraid to mess up or be wrong, because the only way to put out some good things is to put out lots of bad things.

Where else in life do you see the critical process at work?

Reverse the Excuse

on Jan 21, 2010

It’s all too easy to find an excuse to not do something productive. I suggest reversing the excuse so that you make an excuse to do the productive thing. Even better if you can use the same excuse:

Original excuse:
“My muscles are sore today – I’ll skip my training session today”

Reversed excuse:
“My muscles are sore today – I should go to my training session to loosen them up”

You can also reverse the excuse when approaching new endeavors and trying new things:

Instead of letting an excuse hold you back:
I can’t do _____ because

  • I’m not strong enough
  • I’m not flexible enough
  • I’m not experienced enough

Use the excuse as a reason to go for it:
I should do _____ because

  • It will make me stronger
  • It will make me more flexible
  • It will give me experience

What reverse excuses do you use?

Built for an Ancient World

on Jan 20, 2010

The world we live in today is vastly different than the world our minds, and behaviors, evolved for. Humans originally developed their unique traits about 1.8 million years ago and the greatest achievement then was the formation of village-like societies. Nothing changed until about only 40,000 years ago, where still, the greatest accomplishment was seasonal trade between tribes. But at a mere 10,000 years ago, humans formed large scale civilizations and our societies had grown massively from that point to this very day. Because genetic evolution moves so slowly, it cannot create adaptive behaviors to keep up with a radically changing world. It is very unlikely that human behaviors adapted to the last 10,000 years; without a doubt, they aren’t adapted to the radical societal changes of the last 150 years.

So we’re left in a modern world of today with a brain built for a world 10,000 years ago. Obviously, we see quirks. We see irrational behavior because the mechanisms in the head were built for an entirely different environment.

The Case Against Anti-lock Brakes

on Jan 19, 2010

Anti-lock brakes (ABS) are touted as a safety feature on cars. They work to solve the problem where excessive braking force causes the friction between the brakes and the wheels from exceeding the friction between the wheels and the road (without ABS, the brakes lock the wheels in place so that the wheels slide on the ground which in turn prevents braking and turning – rather dangerous). ABS “prevents” this from happening by reducing braking force when it senses the brakes have locked.

However, ABS introduces its own set of dangers and other disadvantages. First, the function of ABS can be misinterpreted. Although ABS prevents the car from skidding when too much braking force is applied, it do not increase braking power. Braking power, ABS or not, is limited by the amount of grip between the tires and road. This fact is not clear to many drivers nor is it one stated by those touting ABS.

Second, a danger lies in risk compensation - where having ABS gives drivers a falsely sense of security, causing drivers to drive with less care. Drivers who don’t have ABS, on the contrary, may have a very real perception of how dangerous conditions can be; often from experiencing their brakes locking. The non-ABS driver prevents locking by carefully applying pressure to the brake pedal, which requires the driver to be well aware of the road conditions. This awareness, needed by non-ABS drivers to judge maximum braking force, is not needed by ABS drivers which causes them to be less respective of dangerous driving conditions. Remember: there is no difference in braking power between ABS and non-ABS cars. The very nature of ABS is that it allows for safety after the danger point (too much braking in dangerous conditions) has occurred while the nature of non-ABS requires preventing such a situation from occurring. We already know that we’re better off preventing problems than treating them after allowing them to occur.

Third, ABS adds complexity to the vehicle – something could break (there are redundency systems in place – even more complexity!) and it adds to the cost of the car. This makes little sense if the technology doesn’t realistically improve safety.

Unfortunately, drivers in the US no longer have a choice on ABS because it is a standard feature, by law, on all new cars. Still, I believe ABS can be a very useful technology if used mindfully and with a proper understanding of its limits along with regard for road conditions.

What do you think about ABS?

Fault

on Jan 19, 2010

It’s pointless to blame others for influencing your bad decisions. The negative consequences ultimately fall on you. So it’s up to you to affect what happens. Surely others may play a role but that doesn’t matter because it’s your life. Do you want to blame others for your failings? Or will you stand up and make your own life better?

Any other ideas on bettering life through a change of attitude?

Don’t Treat Problems, Prevent Them

on Jan 19, 2010

Foresight can be a great asset. Understanding the manner by which problems arise helps you take steps to prevent said problems. Often, preventing problems of the future (benefit) does require extra effort (cost) at the present. But it is well worth it because the effort required to deal with a problem if, or when, it crops up is typically much greater than the initial prevention requirements. So keep the future on your mind. Avoid yourself great expense and especially great suffering.

The most obvious application for this is with your own wellbeing. Everything you do every single day plays a role in this. Unfortunately, it is something that many of us need to improve upon.

What are some other places to apply this concept? And what are ways to fight impulses of the present that sabotage the prevention of future problems?